Set up comparisonChoose your headphones, a target and a local audio file.

HEADPHONE TONAL EXPERIENCE

NEW

Virtual Headphones

Choose the headphones you are wearing. Then hear the general tonal character of 2,898 headphones and earphones. Your audio stays in this browser.

WINDOWS VST3 · macOS VST3 · AU VIRTUAL HEADPHONES FOR YOUR DAW Use Virtual Headphones directly in compatible DAWs on Windows and macOS. OPEN PLUGIN PAGE →

SETUP

Choose two products and one audio file

2,898 TARGET MODELS · 445 VERIFIED OVER-EAR REFERENCES

1 MY HEADPHONES Select the exact model that you are using now.
2 TARGET MODEL Choose a target to see its reference level.
3 AUDIO FILE No file selected Use a familiar song with bass, vocals, and high-frequency detail.
Choose your headphones, a target, and an audio file.

PRIVATE SYNC

Save this Virtual Headphones workspace

Checking…

Keep your headphones, recent targets, favorites, Quick Compare list, and model notes available on another signed-in device.

Checking this browser…

The comparison tool and browser saves remain available without an account.

Only model identifiers, lists, and notes are saved. Your audio file stays on this device and is never uploaded.

INFO

What this comparison can tell you

Broad tonal character

The tool applies a controlled version of the measured difference between your headphones and the selected target. It is useful for comparing bass, midrange and treble balance.

Your audio stays local

The selected audio file is decoded and processed only in this browser. It is not included in My SolAudioLab cloud saves.

Practical limits

  • Fit, seal, pads and individual hearing can change the real result.
  • Extreme bass and high-treble corrections are reduced.
  • This is a tonal reference, not a replacement for listening to the real product.

What this test is trying to do

The tool compares the measured tonal deviation of the headphones you are wearing with the measured tonal deviation of the selected target. It then applies a controlled difference with browser audio filters.

The result is useful for exploring broad tonal character before a real listening test. It cannot replace wearing the selected product yourself.

Choose your headphones, a target, and an audio file. The headphone database could not be loaded. Please reload the page. The audio file is ready. Start the comparison when the two products are selected. This audio is short. A longer familiar section may make tonal differences easier to judge. This is a long audio file. Browser playback can still work, but a shorter familiar section is easier to compare. This browser could not open the selected audio file. Try a standard WAV file or MP3 file. Use this simulation to hear the general tonal character of this type of in-ear device. The exact sound can vary depending on the listener and how the device fits. Both products use the same measurement source and product type. The products use different measurement sources or rigs. The broad tonal comparison is useful, but the result has additional measurement uncertainty. The same product is selected on both sides, so no tonal change is applied. Playback started. Switch between the two large buttons without changing the playback position. Playback could not start. Press play again after checking the browser audio permission. Same-type comparison In-ear listening reference Different measurement sources The products use the same broad headphone type. The measurement source and rig match. The target profile passed the stricter data review. The measurement source or rig is different. The target profile has more measurement uncertainty than the strictest profiles. Use this result to compare bass balance, vocal presence, brightness, and overall tonal character. The exact in-ear sound varies with ear shape, fit, insertion depth, and seal. Less consistent frequency regions and large corrections are reduced for a stable listening reference. The same measurement profile is selected on both sides. The target has clearly less low-frequency energy in this comparison. The target has slightly less low-frequency energy. The low-frequency balance is broadly similar. The target has slightly more low-frequency energy. The target has clearly more low-frequency energy in this comparison. The target may place voices and midrange details farther back. The target may sound slightly less forward through the midrange. The middle-frequency balance is broadly similar. The target may sound slightly more forward through the midrange. The target may bring voices and midrange details clearly forward. The target may sound clearly softer or darker in the high frequencies. The target may sound slightly softer in the high frequencies. The high-frequency balance is broadly similar. The target may sound slightly brighter in the high frequencies. The target may sound clearly brighter in the high frequencies.